What the 2026 grid-fee reform means for C&I rooftops

The reform published by the regulator in March takes effect on 1 January 2026, and it changes how commercial and industrial sites are billed for the grid, not just for the energy they draw. Until now, most C&I rooftops in our service territory paid a demand charge set on a single monthly peak — one bad fifteen-minute window in July could define the bill. From next year that charge splits into a coincident-peak component tied to the utility’s own system peaks and a lower non-coincident component. In plain terms, the grid stops penalising you for being busy and starts pricing when you are busy.

We have modelled the new tariff against 42 of our operating sites, from a 220 kWp warehouse roof in Hamlin to a 3.1 MWp cold-storage array outside Glenmere. The pattern is consistent. A flat solar-only roof shaves energy volume but barely touches the coincident-peak charge, because our regional peaks now land between 18:00 and 20:00 in winter — after the array has stopped producing. On several sites the demand-charge line item falls by less than 8 percent even where self-consumption tops 60 percent.

Where storage rewrites the bill

The math changes the moment you add batteries. On the Glenmere site we paired the existing 3.1 MWp array with a 1.2 MW / 2.4 MWh battery and dispatched it purely against the four forecast coincident-peak intervals. Annual demand charges dropped from roughly 118,000 to 41,000 in the model — a 65 percent cut — while the energy arbitrage was almost incidental. The storage was not there to move kilowatt-hours; it was there to be invisible during four hours a month when the grid is most expensive.

Who wins, then, is straightforward. Sites with steady daytime loads and no storage see modest gains. Sites that can shift or shave their evening coincidence — through batteries, thermal mass, or simply rescheduling a shift — capture most of the upside. Who pays is the operator who assumes a rooftop array alone still clears the demand charge the way it did in 2023. That assumption is now roughly a decade out of date.

There is a timing wrinkle worth flagging. The coincident-peak windows are published day-ahead, so dispatch has to be forecast-driven, not rule-of-thumb. We have retrofitted our monitoring stack on twelve sites to pull the utility’s day-ahead signal automatically; manual dispatch left about a fifth of the savings on the table in our December pilot.

Our read is simple. If you are sizing a C&I rooftop for 2026 and beyond, model the demand charge first and the energy yield second, and treat storage as part of the base case rather than an upgrade. We are happy to run your last twelve months of interval data against the new tariff before you commit to a design.

Read More

Industrial Solar signs 18 MW microgrid for the Port of Gdańsk

The Port of Gdańsk asked for something that does not exist yet on the Polish Baltic coast: a quayside energy system that can power cold-ironing berths, absorb the swings of container-handling cranes, and keep the lights on when the grid connection is constrained. The contract we signed last week covers all three, and it is built around one balancing system rather than three separate installations bolted together.

The numbers set the shape of the project. We are delivering 18 MW of ground-mounted and rooftop solar across the DCT terminal and adjacent logistics buildings, backed by a 22 MWh lithium-iron-phosphate battery, and tied into 6 MW of shore-power connections for berthed vessels. Combined, the array should produce roughly 19 GWh a year, covering close to 40 percent of the port’s annual electricity draw and cutting diesel auxiliary-engine running at the quay to near zero during layover.

One controller, three loads

The engineering problem here is not generation, it is coordination. Crane regeneration, shore-power ramps and solar intermittency all hit the same connection point, and the port’s grid tie is capped at 14 MW. We put the whole site under a single energy-management controller that dispatches the battery against a live load forecast, so peaks are shaved before they reach the meter and surplus midday generation is stored rather than curtailed. Our engineering, procurement and construction teams sit under one roof, which let us run the interconnection study, the battery sizing and the shore-power detailed design in parallel instead of waiting on each other.

Storage does the heavy lifting on economics. By holding the connection below its cap, the battery lets the port avoid a costly grid reinforcement that would have added eighteen months and a substation to the schedule. It also gives the terminal a black-start reserve for the reefer stacks, where a lost hour of cooling is measured in spoiled cargo rather than kilowatt-hours.

Shore power is the part that matters most to the surrounding city. Container ships at berth in Gdańsk currently idle on marine diesel; the 6 MW connection lets them plug in and shut those engines down, which removes an estimated 11,000 tonnes of CO2 and a good deal of local particulate each year. The connection is sized for the terminal’s largest regular callers and built to the international OPS standard, so no vessel needs bespoke equipment to use it.

Construction starts in Q4, beginning with the battery enclosure and the medium-voltage switchgear so the balancing system is live before the last modules go up. We expect mechanical completion inside eleven months and full commissioning in the following quarter, weather on the bay permitting. It is our first port microgrid, and on a site this dense with moving loads, it is the clearest case we have built for treating solar, storage and shore power as one machine rather than three.

Read More
Buy Theme - $39 Launch It For Me